Emil Brikha Fan Page on Facebook Emil Brikha Channel on Youtube Emil Brikha Photo Gallery at Flickr

Emil Brikha – The portal to self.

…and all that is life.

I’m sorry, I love tits and ass.

Recently in Sweden, it was decided by an indoor public swimming facility to allow women to swim topless. The reason for this was because gender equality, that the same rules should apply to both women and men. I had a conversation about this with a woman who studies gender science and it led me to the conclusion that these people are quite frankly out of their minds.
Why? According to her it’s about desexualizing the female breasts. I have to ask, is that really a road we want to take? I asked her if she really didn’t want her man to look at her breasts and become aroused, she said it would be different because they share an intimacy together and that would make her breasts desirable to her man but any other sets of perfectly shaped tits would be like… ehm, shoulders, or something.
Call me a caveman but I don’t think women want men to stop becoming horny by their exposed bodies. Am I wrong? I’m not saying women should be objectified and that they need to be naked to be validated by men. I’m just saying sex and nudity has a time and a place and should remain a tiny bit mystified. Another reason is that I as a (hu)man kind of would like to choose when I want to see naked people. I would like to choose when I get aroused by someone. I simply don’t want to see naked women everywhere because walking with a erection is pretty damn hard (until it becomes desexualized which then probably would lead to pretty damn boring sex).
To the above stated and last mentioned reason many feminists would argue that it’s my problem if I become horny because a woman shows “too much” and that it shouldn’t be a woman’s problem if a man gets turned on by the way she dresses. Well, the day your man stops looking at you in any type of sexual way because your body has been desexualized, then you’re the one with the problem.
Let’s pretend that the “shared intimacy” between a couple would be a valid explanation to how it would be different between seeing nudity on the streets and nudity in the bedroom. Let’s pretend that it is my problem that I become aroused by women’s naked bodies. Let’s look at it from the perspective that (the male dominated) society has shaped my sexual identity and that breasts make me horny because they are covered. In this case I would be called the predator and women would be my victims (pet nearest women on the head now).
Let me then ask you this. What about makeup? Feminists (who use makeup) strongly and passionately argue that they have to wear makeup to be accepted by society. That, if they don’t wear it, they are considered outcasts and weirdos. They say they are victims of a society which has shaped them to believe that they are not beautiful without any makeup. They say that they are victims. Again, victims.
I will speak for men all over the world and say that, we don’t care about your latest foundation or eyeliner. Sure, a little makeup can look good but between a little makeup and Lady Gaga there is a lot of room for customization. Yet women see themselves as victims in this.
If women are victims in this regard, what are we as men when it comes to our fixation of breasts and nudity? We have grown up in the same society which has told us that boys don’t cry, feelings are for girls and tits are awesome. We get bombarded by airbrushed silicone women all day everyday and you want to talk about being victims and us being predators?
Let’s face it. Sex is already oversaturated in society and feminists need to get over this whole Predator/Victim issue. We are all victims and predators within the confiding walls of society which tells us to supersize, touch up, tuck in and flip out. At this point I’m not far from reducing these feminists to insecure women with penis envy and I’ll be damned if let that come between me and juicy boobs.

curvesRecently in Sweden, it was decided by an indoor public swimming facility to allow women to swim topless. The reason for this was because gender equality, that the same rules should apply to both women and men. I had a conversation about this with a woman who studies gender science and it led me to the conclusion that these people are quite frankly out of their minds.

Why? According to her it’s about desexualizing the female breasts. I have to ask, is that really a road we want to take? I asked her if she really didn’t want her man to look at her breasts and become aroused, she said it would be different because they share an intimacy together and that would make her breasts desirable to her man but any other sets of perfectly shaped tits would be like… ehm, shoulders, or something.

Call me a caveman but I don’t think women want men to stop becoming horny by their exposed bodies. Am I wrong? I’m not saying women should be objectified and that they need to be naked to be validated by men. I’m just saying sex and nudity has a time and a place and should remain a tiny bit mystified. Another reason is that I as a (hu)man kind of would like to choose when I want to see naked people. I would like to choose when I get aroused by someone. I simply don’t want to see naked women everywhere because walking with a erection is pretty damn hard (until it becomes desexualized which then probably would lead to pretty damn boring sex).

To the above stated and last mentioned reason many feminists would argue that it’s my problem if I become horny because a woman shows “too much” and that it shouldn’t be a woman’s problem if a man gets turned on by the way she dresses. Well, the day your man stops looking at you in any type of sexual way because your body has been desexualized, then you’re the one with the problem.

Let’s pretend that the “shared intimacy” between a couple would be a valid explanation to how it would be different between seeing nudity on the streets and nudity in the bedroom. Let’s pretend that it is my problem that I become aroused by women’s naked bodies. Let’s look at it from the perspective that (the male dominated) society has shaped my sexual identity and that breasts make me horny because they are covered. In this case I would be called the predator and women would be my victims (pet nearest women on the head now).

Let me then ask you this. What about makeup? Feminists (who use makeup) strongly and passionately argue that they have to wear makeup to be accepted by society. That, if they don’t wear it, they are considered outcasts and weirdos. They say they are victims of a society which has shaped them to believe that they are not beautiful without any makeup. They say that they are victims. Again, victims.

I will speak for men all over the world and say that, we don’t care about your latest foundation or eyeliner. Sure, a little makeup can look good but between a little makeup and Lady Gaga there is a lot of room for customization. Yet women see themselves as victims in this.

If women are victims in this regard, what are we as men when it comes to our fixation of breasts and nudity? We have grown up in the same society which has told us that boys don’t cry, feelings are for girls and tits are awesome. We get bombarded by airbrushed silicone women all day everyday and you want to talk about being victims and us being predators?

Let’s face it. Sex is already oversaturated in society and feminists need to get over this whole Predator/Victim issue. We are all victims and predators within the confiding walls of society which tells us to supersize, touch up, tuck in and flip out. At this point I’m not far from reducing these feminists to insecure women with penis envy and I’ll be damned if I’ll let that come between me and juicy boobs.

Share on Facebook

5 Comments »

  AMERICA wrote @ December 8th, 2009 at 01:34

I LOOOOOVE U!

  Emil Brikha wrote @ December 8th, 2009 at 01:42

Of course you do :)

  Zara wrote @ December 8th, 2009 at 10:12

I’m gonna have to agree to disagree.

First and foremost, claiming to desexualize female breasts by uncovering them is going a bit too far – in fact, for example trained male shoulders, abdomen and pectoralis are very sexual for us women, whether covered or not.

Secondly, to continue from there, I do not believe that by equalizing our bathing suits we by any means desexualize any body parts, but yes, we put into question the whole concept of Nudity Equals Sex, i.e. I disagree with the conception that nudity necessarily implies sexuality/sexyness. In Finnish sauna tradition, nudity in itself has never been seen as the only necessary part of sexuality, in fact, sexuality needs a bit more than just a few square centimeters of exposed flesh. I have been brought up in a culture, where my exposed tits are seen sexual only in sexual circumstances; that is, in sauna they are rarely seen as sexual objects – this depends of course of the situation and the people in the sauna – but when undressing in front of a lover, or when dressing my breasts in sexy clothes for a dinner party, or even when covering them completely while going to a night club, THEN, they might turn into sexual objects. … Mostra tutto

In other words; I find it not only boring and simplistic to associate nudity with sexuality so directly, I also personally enjoy being nude in e.g. sauna and NOT worry about sexual desires. Nudity is a natural condition; throughout human history bare breasts have been exposed in comfort without affecting male desire over female bodies – why should our ‘Western’ culture of nudity be better?

I vote for a redefinition of this outdated, Victorian conception of nudity, and vouch for a ’sensualist & ‘naturalist” approach to sexuality. I hail the new Swedish regulation and would wish other countries to follow. I find bikinis uncomfortable. In fact, what the heck, why limit corporal exposure only to sauna situations – I think we should be allowed to be completely nude even at beaches and swimming faciities! :P

  Emil Brikha wrote @ December 8th, 2009 at 10:22

If you want to attend nudist beaches or saunas, that is your right to do so. I’m not saying there shouldn’t be alternative places to accommodate different views on nudity. I’m simply saying, I don’t want breasts in my face in a public space where I haven’t chosen to have breasts in my face.

I have been at nudist places and I enjoyed the natural aspects of it, but if anyone tells me that they don’t go home and jerk off to the thought of some hot chick they saw… I’ll call them filthy liers.

  psykhe wrote @ April 27th, 2010 at 14:11

Well, I grew up in the comunist eastern Europe, where even basic rights like a men wearing long hear or wearing jeans was not allowed… so maybe is something wrong with me, but I just can’t comprehend the swedish view of seing the equality between sexes. Ok, for me, if I can swim topless in public places it doesn’t matter, whatever… I already had a topless swim in a public pool, because I forgot the suit at home but I wanted to swim :) .

But why are they trying to deny the fact that women and men are different? Beginning with the XX and XY chromosomes… men have a penis and women have tits… women get pregnant and for men is much easier to grow muscles. At least in most of the cases :) . It’s in our nature to be different and you can’t change that. Now, getting back to sexuality, it’s in the human nature to be attracted by the mystery, to be curious and to wish to discover. Take this from the (hu)man and you’ll and up with androids…

Your comment

HTML-Tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>